Advertisement
FULL-LENGTH ARTICLE | Regulatory Practices| Volume 24, ISSUE 3, P344-355, March 2022

Download started.

Ok

An industry survey of implementation strategies for clinical supply chain management of cell and gene therapies

  • Lequina Myles
    Correspondence
    Correspondence: Lequina Myles, DRSc, MS, MBA, Department of Regulatory and Clinical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar St, CHP 140, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Regulatory and Clinical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Terry David Church
    Affiliations
    Department of Regulatory and Clinical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:November 06, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.09.012

Abstract

Background aims

The novelty of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) has introduced unique supply chain challenges and considerations not seen by chemically synthesized (small-molecule) drugs. These complexities increase during the clinical phases, where drug safety and efficacy milestones are still underdeveloped. For example, for autologous therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, in which the treatment is developed from the patient's own cells, supply chain management plays an integral role in chemistry, manufacturing and control processes. Supply chain management requires proactive planning because of the strict cold chain requirements and time sensitivity of CGTs. This research examines strategies and responses to challenges experienced by industry stakeholders (e.g., sponsors and manufacturers) during the implementation phases of clinical supply chain management. This research further evaluates the adequacy of the current regulatory framework for distribution and supply chain management of CGTs in the US.

Methods

A survey methodology was used to query subject matter experts from the biopharmaceutical industry who were familiar with the clinical supply management of CGTs in the US. The survey instrument was developed using an implementation framework and disseminated electronically to mid- and senior-level subject matter experts who had experience with clinical trials, supply chain management and CGTs.

Results

A total of 128 respondents accessed the survey, and 105 respondents answered at least one question. Seventy-five respondents completed the survey. Results showed that a lack of harmonization in regulations across the supply chain, limited resources, challenges with vendor management, high costs and complexities in the supply chain due to product specificity and customization proved to be impediments for the industry. In addition, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had a significant impact on supply chain implementation. The results revealed that less than half of the respondents had business continuity plans in place. These challenges increased for smaller and mid-size organizations. Thirty percent of small and mid-size organizations were less prepared to scale up than larger companies.

Conclusions

Suggestions from industry stakeholders were to adopt and enforce Good Distribution Practices in the US (81%), pre-plan distribution strategies with internal and external stakeholders along the supply chain and develop agile systems and robust processes end to end. Hurdles in scaling up and scaling out from the clinical to commercial phases for time- and temperature-sensitive CGT products make it difficult to predict the supply chain's long-term feasibility. Although there are initiatives to improve these impediments, such as improving industry partnerships and creating global CGT transportation standards, there are still regulatory knowledge gaps present for CGTs. Therefore, it is essential to establish a baseline and foundation for CGT supply chains extending beyond the loading dock.

Key Words

To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

Purchase one-time access:

Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
  • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
  • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

Subscribe:

Subscribe to Cytotherapy
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

References

    • Hanna E
    • Rémuzat C
    • Auquier P
    • Toumi M.
    Advanced therapy medicinal products: current and future perspectives.
    J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Apr 25; ([cited 2019 Jul 24];4. Available from:)
    • Hanna E
    • Rémuzat C
    • Auquier P
    • Toumi M.
    Gene therapies development: slow progress and promising prospect.
    J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Jan 3; 5 ([cited 2019 Jul 19]Available from:)
    • Shahryari A
    • Saghaeian Jazi M
    • Mohammadi S
    • Razavi Nikoo H
    • Nazari Z
    • Hosseini ES
    • et al.
    Development and Clinical Translation of Approved Gene Therapy Products for Genetic Disorders.
    Front Genet. 2019; 10 ([cited 2020 Sep 27]Available from:)
    • Gerlovin L
    • Diesel P.
    Cell & gene therapies calling for innovation in drug development.
    Drug Development and Delivery. 2018 Aug 27; ([cited 2020 May 19]; Available from:)
  1. Alliance for Regenerative Medicine. 2020: Growth & Resilience in Regenerative Medicine. 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 22]. Available from: https://alliancerm.org/sector-report/2020-annual-report/

  2. Alliance for Regenerative Medicine. Regenerative Medicine in 2021: A Year of Firsts and Records. 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 22]. Available from: https://alliancerm.org/sector-report/h1-2021-report/

  3. Wechsler J. FDA tackles cellular, gene therapies. BioPharm International. 2016 Oct 24 [cited 2019 May 29]; Available from: http://www.biopharminternational.com/fda-tackles-cellular-gene-therapies-0

    • Cross R.
    FDA prepares for huge growth in cell and gene therapy.
    Chemical & Engineering News. 2019 Jan 16; 97 ([cited 2019 May 13]Available from:)
    • Sagonowsky E.
    Bristol Myers Squibb's CAR-T liso-cel wins long-delayed FDA nod.
    FiercePharma. 2021 Feb 5; ([cited 2021 Feb 5]; Available from:)
    • FDA
    Approved cellular and gene therapy products.
    Food and Drug Administration. 2019 Dec 20; ([cited 2020 Jan 22]; Available from:)
    • FDA
    FDA approves new treatment for adults with relapsed or refractory large-B-cell lymphoma.
    Food and Drug Administration. 2021; ([cited 2021 Feb 6]. Available from:)
  4. BioMarin. BioMarin Receives Complete Response Letter (CRL) from FDA for Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec Gene Therapy for Severe Hemophilia A. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 12]. Available from: https://investors.biomarin.com/2020-08-19-BioMarin-Receives-Complete-Response-Letter-CRL-from-FDA-for-Valoctocogene-Roxaparvovec-Gene-Therapy-for-Severe-Hemophilia-A

  5. Bristol Myers Squibb. Bristol Myers Squibb and bluebird bio Provide Regulatory Update on Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 12]. Available from: https://news.bms.com/news/corporate-financial/2020/Bristol-Myers-Squibb-and-bluebird-bio-Provide-Regulatory-Update-on-Idecabtagene-Vicleucel-ide-cel-bb2121-for-the-Treatment-of-Patients-with-Multiple-Myeloma/default.aspx

    • Lamb M.
    Small Molecule Vs Cell Therapy Clinical Trial Supply Chain.
    TrakCel. 2017; (Available from:): 1-8
    • Lamb M
    • Margolin RE
    • Vitale J.
    Personalized Supply Chains for Cell Therapies.
    Cell Gene Therapy Insights. 2017; 3: 815-833
    • Godshalk J.
    Gene Therapy Products: Separate Regulations?.
    BioProcess International. 2020 Jan 31; ([cited 2020 Oct 1]; Available from:)
  6. Novartis. Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel) efficacy data & clinical trials. 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.hcp.novartis.com/products/kymriah/acute-lymphoblastic-leukemia-children/efficacy/

  7. Novartis. AveXis receives FDA approval for Zolgensma®, the first and only gene therapy for pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/avexis-receives-fda-approval-zolgensma-first-and-only-gene-therapy-pediatric-patients-spinal-muscular-atrophy-sma

  8. Yescarta. CAR T personalized immunotherapy from YESCARTA® (axicabtagene ciloleucel). 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 6]. Available from: https://www.yescarta.com/personalized-immunotherapy#how-yescarta-works

    • Witcher M.
    Why Controlling CQAs Isn't Good Enough For Gene Cell Therapies.
    Cell & Gene. 2020 Mar; ([cited 2020 Sep 6]; Available from:)
    • Clarke D
    • Smith D.
    Managing starting material stability to maximize manufacturing flexibility and downstream efficiency.
    Cell & Gene Therapy Insights. 2019; 5: 303-314
    • Wang X
    • Rivière I.
    Clinical manufacturing of CAR T cells: foundation of a promising therapy.
    Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics. 2016; 3: 16015
  9. Stanton D. Dude where's my CAR-T? Personalised meds need personalised logistics, says TrakCel. biopharma-reporter.com. 2017 Aug 31 [cited 2019 May 21]; Available from: https://www.biopharma-reporter.com/Article/2017/09/01/Novartis-must-prove-it-can-handle-complex-CAR-T-supply-chain-TrakCel

    • Shanley A.
    Clinical manufacturing: clearing higher hurdles.
    Pharmaceutical Technology. 2018 Aug 28; 42: 60-63
    • Palmer E.
    Dendreon, done in by expensive, complex manufacturing, files for bankruptcy.
    FiercePharma. 2014; ([cited 2020 Sep 6]; Available from:)
    • Krader CG.
    Multifaceted approach addresses pandemic's threat to prostate cancer care.
    Urology Times. 2020; ([cited 2020 Sep 7]; Available from:)
    • Keshavan M.
    Inside a factory churning out the latest cancer cell therapies.
    STAT. 2016 Dec 6; ([cited 2020 Feb 28]; Available from:)
  10. Sawicki MW. The chain of compliance. Contract Pharma. 2018 Jun 12 [cited 2020 Mar 26]; Available from: https://www.contractpharma.com/issues/2018-06-01/view_features/the-chain-of-compliance/

    • Hagen H.
    Chain of identity and chain of custody in personalized therapies - core differences from traditional pharma.
    Vineti. 2019 Oct 30; ([cited 2020 Apr 22]; Available from:)
    • Cytiva
    Standardizing The Vein-To-Vein Logistics Workflow To Reach More Patients.
    Cell & Gene. 2019; ([cited 2020 Dec 31]; Available from:)
    • Cytiva
    Unifying cell therapy logistics and manufacturing.
    Cytiva. 2020; ([cited 2020 Apr 22]. Available from:)
    • Labant M.
    As Needs Change, the CRO Industry Adapts.
    GEN - Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News. 2020; 40 ([cited 2020 Dec 30]Available from:)
    • Elverum K
    • Whitman M.
    Delivering cellular and gene therapies to patients: solutions for realizing the potential of the next generation of medicine.
    Gene Therapy. 2019;
    • Harrington L.
    Biopharmaceutical Cold Chain Best Practices.
    JOC. 2018; ([cited 2019 May 5]; Available from:)
    • Meacle F
    • Salkin J
    • Rice M
    • Harris I
    Key considerations of cell and gene therapy cold chain logistics.
    Cell Gene Therapy Insights. 2016; 2: 223-236
  11. Tavakoli F. Cryogenic transport for gene therapy products — exploring the pros and cons. 2019 Mar 21 [cited 2020 Apr 1]; Available from: https://www.cellandgene.com/doc/cryogenic-transport-for-gene-therapy-products-exploring-the-pros-and-cons-0001

    • Yarbough C.
    Intricate supply chain complicates gene therapy manufacturing.
    Cell & Gene. 2018; ([cited 2020 Apr 1]; Available from:)
    • Kumar N
    • Jha A.
    Temperature excursion management: A novel approach of quality system in pharmaceutical industry.
    Saudi Pharm J. 2017; 25: 176-183
    • Dearment A.
    For CAR-Ts to be successful, figuring out manufacturing is key.
    MedCity News. 2019; ([cited 2020 Feb 28]; Available from:)
    • Young S.
    Getting the supply chain right for biologics.
    World Pharma Today. 2019; ([cited 2019 Aug 21]; Available from:)
    • Sykes C.
    Time- and temperature-controlled transport: supply chain challenges and solutions.
    P T. 2018; 43: 154-170
    • McHarg J.
    Cold chain as a Service: Is outsourcing the next step for pharmaceutical logistics?.
    Pharma Logistics IQ. 2019; ([cited 2020 Apr 28]; Available from:)
    • McHarg J.
    No-compromise cold chains.
    Pharma Manufacturing. 2019; ([cited 2020 Apr 28]; Available from:)
    • International Conference ICH.
    On Harmonisation Of Technical Requirements For Registration Of Pharmaceuticals For Human Use : Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2).
    in: International Conference On Harmonisation. 2015 ([cited 2019 Aug 21]. Available from:)
  12. FDA. E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1). 2018. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/e6r2-good-clinical-practice-integrated-addendum-ich-e6r1

    • EMA
    Good distribution practice.
    European Medicines Agency, 2018 ([cited 2019 Jul 10]. Available from:)
  13. ANVISA. Página Inicial da Anvisa—Anvisa. 2019 [cited 2019 May 2]. Available from: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/

    • NMPA
    Main responsibilities of the National Medical Products Administration. National Medical Products Administration.
    2019 ([cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from:)
    • Fixsen
    • et al.
    Implementation science: Key concepts, themes, and evidence for practitioners in educational psychology.
    Handbook of Implementation Science for Psychology in Education. 2012; : 13-34
  14. Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide.
    4th Edition. Wiley. Wiley.com, 2021 (citedAvailable from:)
  15. Devroe R, Wauters B. How to Enhance the External Validity of Survey Experiments? A Discussion on the Basis of an Experimental Study on Political Gender Stereotypes in Flanders (Belgium). 2019.

    • Zuidgeest M
    • Hendriks M
    • Koopman L
    • Spreeuwenberg P
    • Rademakers J.
    A Comparison of a Postal Survey and Mixed-Mode Survey Using a Questionnaire on Patients’ Experiences With Breast Care.
    Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13: e68
    • Baruch Y
    • Holtom B.
    Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research.
    Human Relations. 2008; 61: 1139-1160
    • Hoonakker P
    • Carayon P.
    Questionnaire Survey Nonresponse: A comparison of postal mail and Internet surveys.
    International Journal of Human Computer Interaction. 2009; 25: 348-373
    • Fan W
    • Yan Z.
    Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review.
    Computers in Human Behavior. 2010; 26: 132-139
  16. Saleh A, Bista K. Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate Students. Vol. 13, Online Submission. 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 10]. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED596616

  17. Colasante W, Pascale D, Gerlovin L. How are cell and gene therapies changing drug development models. 2018 Jul 12 [cited 2019 May 1]; Available from: https://www.cellandgene.com/doc/how-are-cell-and-gene-therapies-changing-drug-development-models-0001

    • Heidaran M.
    Establishing manufacturing controls: a hurdle for the cell and gene therapy industry.
    Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society (RAPS). 2019; ([cited 2020 Mar 29]; Available from:)
    • AuWerter
    • et al.
    Cell and gene therapy: Biopharma portfolio strategy.
    McKinsey. 2020; ([cited 2020 Oct 10]; Available from:)
    • Sullivan T.A.
    Tough Road: Cost To Develop One New Drug Is $2.6 Billion; Approval Rate for Drugs Entering Clinical Development is Less Than 12%.
    Policy & Medicine. 2019; ([cited 2021 Jan 3]; Available from:)
  18. CPhI. Global Business Report Industry Explorations: UNITED STATES BIOPHARMACEUTICALS 2019. 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 7]. Available from: https://www.gbreports.com/files/pdf/_2019/US_Biopharma_2019.pdf

    • Ebel T
    • Larsen E
    • Ketan S.
    Strengthening health care's supply chain: A five-step plan.
    McKinsey & Company. 2013; ([cited 2020 Dec 30]; Available from:)
    • Grande R.
    Top Trends in Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Costs.
    Definitive Healthcare. 2020; ([cited 2020 Dec 30]. Available from:)
    • Gu G.
    Even With High Costs & Uncertainty, Gene Therapy Finds Funding And Warm IPO Waters.
    Crunchbase News. 2017; ([cited 2020 Oct 3]. Available from:)
    • Miller J.
    Novartis bets big on gene therapy with $8.7 billion AveXis deal.
    Reuters. 2018; ([cited 2019 Aug 6]; Available from)
  19. Novartis. Novartis CEO on how to price lifesaving cell and gene therapies. 2018 [cited 2019 May 13]. Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/26/novartis-ceo-on-how-to-price-lifesaving-cell-and-gene-therapies.html

    • Rockoff J
    • Roland D.
    Gilead Bets $11 Billion on New Cancer Therapy.
    The Wall Street Journal. 2017; ([cited 2021 Feb 4]; Available from:)
    • Rees H.
    Is COVID-19 the long overdue wake-up call for pharma supply chains?.
    GMP Review. 2020; 19: 4-7
    • Rees H.
    Is COVID-19 the long overdue wake-up call for pharma supply chains? Part 2.
    GMP Review. 2020; 19 ([cited 2020 Dec 26]Available from:)
  20. Pelican BioThermal. 2019 Biopharma Cold Chain Logistics Survey Report. 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 28]. Available from: https://info.pelicanbiothermal.com/2019tcpsurveyreport-ty?submissionGuid=ff72290e-d7f0-4a13-aeb8-a4f9ebee981b

    • Pharmaceutical Commerce
    Biopharma Cold Chain Sourcebook. 2018; (2018)
    • World Courier
    Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Challenges within the Nordics, Central and Eastern Europe.
    World Courier, 2019 ([cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from:)
  21. FDA. Inspection Observations—Year 2017. FDA; 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 26]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-references/inspection-observations

  22. FDA. Inspection Observations—Year 2018. FDA; 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 26]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-references/inspection-observations

  23. FDA. Warning Letter—McKesson Corportaion. 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/120780/download

  24. FDA. Inspection Observations—Year 2019. FDA; 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 26]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-references/inspection-observations

  25. FDA. Inspection Observations—Year 2020. FDA; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 26]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-references/inspection-observations

  26. FDA. Warning Letters. FDA. FDA; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/compliance-actions-and-activities/warning-letters

  27. Reed C. Establishing A Critical Supply Chain For Autologous Cell And Gene Therapies. 2018 Nov [cited 2020 Sep 7]; Available from: https://www.cellandgene.com/doc/establishing-a-critical-supply-chain-for-autologous-cell-and-gene-therapies-0001

  28. Reed C. Does Blockchain Make Sense For The Cell & Gene Therapy Supply Chain? 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 7]; Available from: https://www.cellandgene.com/doc/does-blockchain-make-sense-for-the-cell-gene-therapy-supply-chain-0001

    • Carrico J.
    The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) new chapter on the storage and distribution of investigational drug product (IDP).
    Pharmaceutical Outsourcing. 2016; ([cited 2020 Apr 18]; Available from:)
  29. Hunt D. United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Updates to Supply Chain Guidelines - 1079, 1079.1 and 1083 (15). 2020.

    • SCB
    Project: Transportation Requirements of Cell Therapy Products.
    Standards Coordinating Body. 2020; ([cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from:)
    • SCB
    Regenerative Medicine Standards in Development Updates: ISO.
    Standards Coordinating Body. 2020; ([cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from:)
  30. USP. Harmonized standards overview. United States Pharmacopeia; 2020 [cited 2020 May 2]. Available from: https://www.usp.org/harmonized-standards-overview

    • Ellison S
    • McCoy R
    • Bell M
    • Frend K
    • Ward S.
    Logistics by design: a framework for advanced therapy developers to create optimal logistics platforms.
    Cell Gene Therapy Insights. 2019; 4: 1019-1040
    • Rees H.
    Supply chain management in the drug industry: delivering patient value for pharmaceuticals and biologics.
    Wiley, Hoboken, N.J2011: 432
    • Basta N.
    Cellular and genetic therapies push into the commercial arena.
    Pharmaceutical Commerce. 2019; ([cited 2020 Sep 12]. Available from:) (/)
  31. FACT. What FACT Accreditation Means To Patients. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 3]. Available from: http://www.factwebsite.org/Inner.aspx?id=351

  32. ISO. ISO 21973:2020 : Biotechnology—General requirements for transportation of cells for therapeutic use. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/07/23/72326.html

View full text